منافسة عامة
✓ مرسّى
توسعة وتوريد أنظمة التخزين
الهيئة السعودية للبيانات والذكاء الاصطناعي
رقم المنافسة
240239011354
المعرّف
#748955
عنوان الضمان الإبتدائى
الهيئة السعودية للبيانات والذكاء الاصطناعي
الغرض من المنافسة
توسعة لأنظمة التخزين لمشروع السحابة الخاصة وزيادة السعة التخزينية لها
| التاريخ | ميلادي | هجري |
|---|---|---|
| تاريخ النشر | 2024/03/12 13:11 | — |
| آخر موعد للاستفسارات | 2024/04/25 | 1445-10-16 |
| آخر موعد تقديم العروض | 2024/05/07 13:00 | 1445-10-28 |
| موعد فتح العروض | 2024/05/07 14:00 | 1445-10-28 |
| موعد فحص العروض | — | — |
| التاريخ المتوقع للترسية | 2024/05/14 | 1445-11-06 |
| تاريخ بدء الأعمال | 2024/06/16 | 1445-12-10 |
| تاريخ خطاب تأكيد المشاركة | — | — |
| بداية إرسال الأسئلة | 2024/04/19 | 1445-10-10 |
| أقصى مدة للإجابة | 10 يوم | |
| مكان فتح العروض | الخدمات المشتركة - لجنة فتح العروض | |
| مدة الوقفة | 5 يوم |
موقع التنفيذ
مجال التصنيف
الأنشطة
- • تقنية المعلومات
وصف المنافسة
الرياض وجدة
جدول 1 المواد - تقنية معلومات
| البند | الفئة | الكمية | وصف البند | المواصفات | وحدة القياس | الرقم التسلسلي | منتج من القائمة الإلزامية |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| توريد وتركيب أجهزة تخزين SAN | جهاز | 2 | توسعة أنظمة التخزين | • SDAIA is looking to expand the existing P-Cloud block storage with 1.5PB of effective capacity storage with three years best support. • The proposed storage system must be 100% NVMe, also all capacity expansion shelves must be connected through NVMe-oF protocol. • Proposed All-Flash NVMe Storage solution must provide Minimum of 1.5TB of effective capacity with data reduction should not exceed 3:1x (only Deduplication and Compression). • The proposed effective capacity should be guaranteed by the vendor in a written format signed by the vendor legal department and it should be based on Deduplication and Compression only (does not include snapshots, clones nor thin provisioning). • This Solution is an expansion to exisiting Block Storage in P-Cloud and integrated with the block storage in P-Cloud also: o This proposed solution should be able to integrate with newly deployed storage solution in SDAIA (replication/management). o Total power consumption should not exceed 2KW peak per site. o 100% End-To-End NVMe. o Free Controllers upgrade. o Flat rate of support pricing. o No end of life or end of support. o All Software Licenses features included from day one. o Block Protocols: Fiber Channel, iSCSI, NVMe-TCP, NVMe-FC and NVMe-oF o File Protocols: NFS and SMB/CiFS o Data Reduction (Deduplication and Compression) always on without any performance impact. o Data Encryption always on without any performanc impact. o Built-in Active Cluster and Data Protection & Replication. o Consistent high-performance and microsecond latency. o 24/7 support (15min SLA for SEV1, and 4hrs for HW replacement) with local depot o Proposed support cover the non-return option for NVMe drives and controllers. • Proposed All-Flash Storage must be highly sustainable by design to reduce data center carbon emissions. It must reduce the environmental footprint in SDAIA by requiring substantially less power, space, and cooling and by producing less waste. • The Hardware specification per site is as follow: o Dual Active/Active storage controllers, with Active-Active paths from both controllers. Active/Optimized paths are not acceptable. o Storage controllers should be configured with latest intel CPU generation, not less than ICE-Lake generation. o Storage controllers must support PCIe Gen4 o 100% NVMe. o NVMe-oF Expansion Shelf. o 4 x 1Gb Ethernet ports for Management (2 per Controller) o 4 x 10Gb/25Gb Ethernet ports for Replication (2 per Controller) o 4 x 10Gb/25Gb Ethernet ports for iSCSi/NVMe-TCP/NAS (2 per Controller) o 4 x 100Gb Ethernet ports for iSCSi/NVMe-TCP/NAS (2 per Controller) o 12 x 32Gb/64Gb FC/NVMe-FC ports (6 per Controller). o Supported Protocols: FC, iSCSi, NVMe-oF(ROCE), NVMe-TCP, NVMe-FC, NFS and SMB/CiFS o Redundant Power Supplies o Redundant Multispeed fans o No single point of failure • The proposed All-Flash storage capacity must be upgradable and expandable without down-time or data migration (Data-in-Place) • The proposed All-Flash Storage should include and guarantee that all existing and future software licenses are included (price inclusive) from day one. • The proposed All-Flash Storage must be offered with 3 years of support minimum, and the vendor should guarantee fixed maintenance price for at least 10-15 years. Any problematic hardware or software must be replaced with like or better as long as the Storage Array is under support. • The Proposed storage system must include a forever controller upgrade to latest generation non-disruptively (Data-In-Place) every three years as long as SDAIA maintains a valid support/maintenance contract. This program should not be a one-time upgrade program and it shouldn't require a separate service or a purchase . • SDAIA is aiming to standardize on a platform that has a unified operating software across High, Mid and low tier platforms to streamline operation and reduce management cost. Vendor should have a unified operating software for all platforms and generations that assures data protections and mobility across different platform models and generations. • The proposed storage system must not have any EOL/EOSL dates and the vendor should guarantee this in writing while maintaining flat support prices “None-increasing”. • Any time of All-Flash Storage expansion with a qualifying capacity purchase, trade-in credit for existing controllers towards the most modern controllers should be applied. • Any capacity expansions not tied to an Upgrade qualify for trade-in credit for a portion of the existing capacity, for less dense flash. • The proposed storage system must be with lifetime warranty on all media without restriction on write rates or time. guaranteed by the vendor in a written format signed by the vendor legal department • The offered storage All-Flash Storage must support different applications and solutions integrations, such as VMware, OpenStack, Containers, Microsoft Solutions, and Automation and orchestration tools such as Ansible, Terraform, Puppet, ..,etc. • Proposed All-Flash Storage must be 99.9999% availability including all software and hardware upgrades • Proposed All-Flash Storage must be a stateless architecture, and is not based on cache design. which means no backup power or battery are required by design. • The proposed All-Flash Storage should guarantee that no performance impact or degradation (under 100% load) during any hardware failure.The array should maintain full performance under load during controller failure. • The Proposed All-Flash Storage must be able to protect data integrity and maintain data availability with no performance impact during simultaneous dual Flash Drives failure. • Proposed All-Flash storage must guarantee non-disruptive software and hardware upgrades with no performance impact, such as upgrading to a higher model, upgrading to a different product generation or any software upgrade. • The proposed All-Flash Storage must support built-in true Active/Active cluster (Metro Cluster) for business continuity architecture where both sites can perform read & write operations without the need for additional hardware, software, or license to support different stretched application clusters. • The proposed All-Flash Storage must support multiple synchronous connections (up to 5 synchronously connected arrays). • The proposed All-Flash Storage must support Non-disruptive data mobility between different platforms (High and Mid-range storage systems) and different generations. • The proposed All-Flash Storage should have Encryption at rest enabled by default (Always-On) with no performance impact and without the need for additional hardware, software, or license. • The proposed All-Flash Storage should support mixing of different size of NVMe Flash Drives in the same Array. This should apply for any future Flash technology. • Support SLA must be 15 minutes response time for Severity 1 cases, and 4 hours to replace for any major hardware failure. | عدد | 1 | 0 |
| رخصة دعم فني لأجهزة التخزين | رخصة | 2 | تقديم الدعم الفني لاجهزة التخزين | يتم تقديم الدعم الفني للازم على مدى ثلاث سنوات من الشركة الأمSolution support must be 3 years. Any problematic hardware or software must be replaced in each datacenter location with like or better as long as the Storage Array under supportVendor support SLA must be 15 minutes response time for Severity 1 cases, and 4 hours to replace for any major hardware failure Storage system must be with lifetime warranty on all media without restriction on write rates or time guaranteed by the vendor in a written format signed by the vendor legal department Storage system must support a forever controller upgrade to latest generation non-disruptively by vendor every 3 years within contract Vendor should provide three customer references that have successfully completed similar upgrades without impacting performance nor migrating data Storage system must not have any EOL/EOSL dates and the vendor should guarantee this in writing while ”maintaining at support prices “None-increasing | عدد | 2 | 0 |
2 بند
كراسة الشروط الرئيسية
المستندات الداعمة (10 ملف)
| اسم المورد | قيمة العرض (ر.س) | قيمة الترسية (ر.س) | النتيجة الفنية | الحالة |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| الشركة العربية لخدمات الانترنت وا لاتصالات شركة مساهمة سعودية مدرجة | 12,415,498.95 | — | مطابق | مشارك |
| شركة المعمر لانظمة المعلومات | 13,155,505.50 | — | مطابق | مشارك |
| شركة بعد للاتصالات السلكية واللاسلكية شركة شخص واحد | 9,182,890.30 | — | غير مطابق | مشارك |
| شركة تقنية السحاب العالمية | 15,369,157.04 | — | مطابق | مشارك |
| شركة إنوفاتيك سيستمز | 3,933,000.00 | — | غير مطابق | مشارك |
| شركة المثلث التقني الكامل شركة شخص واحد | 9,200,000.00 | — | غير مطابق | مشارك |
| الشركة السعودية للحاسبات الالكترونية المحدودة | 11,850,002.50 | — | مطابق | مشارك |
| شركة ام دي اس لانظمه الحاسب الالي شركة شخص واحد | 12,403,706.80 | — | مطابق | مشارك |
| شركة تحكم التقنية المحدوده شركة شخص واحد | 11,969,678.40 | — | مطابق | مشارك |
| الشركة السعودية للحاسبات الالكترونية المحدودة | 11,850,002.50 | 11,850,002.50 | — | مرسّى |
الآليات
تفضيل المنشآت الصغيرة والمتوسطة
معايير التقييم
معايير التقييم الفني
| المستوى الاول | المستوى الثاني | المستوى الثالث | الوزن النهائي |
|---|---|---|---|
| التقييم الفني |
معايير التقييم المالي
| المستوى الاول | المستوى الثاني | المستوى الثالث | الوزن النهائي |
|---|---|---|---|
| التقييم المالي | السعر | التكلفة الكلية | 100% |
أخبار المنافسة
title
تاريخ الإنشاء
value
08/08/45 12:58:01 م
title
تاريخ فتح العروض
value
28/10/45 02:00:00 م
title
تمديد تواريخ المنافسة
value
تاريخ فتح العروض06/10/45 02:00:00 مآخر موعد لتقديم العروض06/10/45 01:00:00 مآخر موعد لإستلام الإستفسارات14/09/45 12:00:00 ص
title
تاريخ الترسيه
value
06/04/1446